1 hour ago
13
The Bank of England’s chief economist Huw Pill is making a case that sounds counterintuitive at first glance: even as the UK labor market loosens up, inflation risks haven’t gone anywhere. In a period where unemployment is climbing and hiring is slowing, Pill insists that the threat of second-round effects, where businesses and workers ratchet up prices and wages to offset rising costs, remains very much alive.
The numbers behind the worry
UK Consumer Price Index inflation sat at 2.8% in April 2026, holding steady from the prior month. That’s already above the BoE’s 2% target, and forecasts suggest it could climb past 3% later this year. The primary culprit: energy costs, amplified by ongoing tensions in the Middle East that have added more than a full percentage point to inflation projections.
Meanwhile, the labor market tells a different story. Unemployment has risen to roughly 5% to 5.2%, with the output gap estimated at around 1% of potential GDP. In plain terms, the economy is running below its full capacity, businesses are hiring less, and there’s more competition for fewer jobs.
Why slack might not be enough
The core of Pill’s argument centers on what economists call second-round effects. When an external shock, like a spike in energy prices, hits an economy, the initial price increase is just round one. Round two happens when businesses pass those higher input costs to consumers, workers demand higher wages to keep up, and a feedback loop takes hold.
Pill’s voting record reflects genuine conviction. At both the April and June 2026 Monetary Policy Committee meetings, he voted for a 25 basis point rate increase that would have brought the benchmark rate to 4%. He was outvoted both times, with the July decision going 6-3 in favor of holding rates steady.
Pill is scheduled to deliver a keynote speech at the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce in September 2026, where he’s expected to reinforce his message about the dangers of letting inflation expectations drift too far from target.
The MPC’s internal divide
Pill’s hawkish stance puts him in a distinct minority on the nine-member MPC. The 6-3 split at the July meeting signals that most policymakers see the current rate level as adequate, at least for now. His argument boils down to this: previous policy tightening may not have been restrictive enough to fully extinguish inflationary pressures, and pausing too early could allow expectations to become unanchored.
What traders and markets should watch
Energy prices remain the wildcard. With Middle East tensions continuing to influence global energy markets, any further escalation could validate Pill’s concerns and shift the MPC’s calculus. Wage data releases over the coming months will be particularly telling. If wage growth remains elevated despite rising unemployment, that would lend direct support to Pill’s thesis about second-round effects persisting through labor market slack. Conversely, a sharp deceleration in pay growth would suggest the majority was right to hold steady.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·