If you’ve followed Bitcoin analysts for any length of time, you’ve probably noticed that the loudest voices are rarely in agreement. Some predict a new golden age for BTC, while others warn of an apocalyptic crash. Two analysts currently at odds are Mike McGlone, Bloomberg’s senior commodity strategist, and Timothy Peterson, a network economist with a strong track record in price modeling. Their latest predictions? One of them says Bitcoin will crash to $10,000 (an 88% drop), while the other believes it will skyrocket to $126,000 by June 2025.
So, who has the better track record? And more importantly, who is wrong more often? Let’s break it down.
McGlone has made a name for himself by throwing out shockingly bearish predictions, often rooted in macroeconomic doom-and-gloom scenarios. His latest take? If the S&P 500 declines by 6%, Bitcoin could collapse to $10,000. He argues that investors are rotating into gold instead of Bitcoin and that the current ETF-driven hype could mirror the dot-com bubble burst of the early 2000s.