China vows to defend companies against US tariffs on Russian energy buyers, boosting case for crypto settlement

The US Senate just handed the crypto industry an unlikely marketing pitch. A bipartisan bill introduced on July 14 would slap tariffs of up to 100% on oil and gas imports from the top five purchasers of Russian energy. China, the largest buyer of Russian crude, is not amused.

Beijing fired back almost immediately. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian called the legislation an unlawful unilateral sanction that lacks United Nations Security Council approval. He emphasized that China would protect its companies’ legitimate rights and interests.

What the Sanctioning Russia Act actually does

The legislation, formally called the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026, targets the five biggest purchasers of Russian oil and gas. That list includes China, India, Slovakia, Hungary, and Azerbaijan. China pulls double duty as both the top crude oil buyer and a leading gas importer.

This bill is a scaled-back version of an earlier proposal. The original floated a blanket 500% tariff. The current 100% cap is Washington’s idea of compromise.

The legislation does include a pressure-release valve. The US president retains authority to waive tariffs on a case-by-case basis if they’re deemed contrary to national interest.

The crypto angle nobody in Washington is talking about

Reports dating back to 2025 show Russia increasingly turning to digital assets for oil trade settlements with China and India. Stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies have become practical tools for moving value across borders when traditional banking rails are blocked or threatened.

Tether’s USDT has historically dominated in markets where participants want dollar exposure without dollar banking access. But if secondary sanctions start targeting dollar-pegged stablecoins, the door opens for yuan-pegged alternatives or commodity-backed tokens designed specifically for trade settlement. China’s digital yuan pilot has been running for years, and a scenario where it becomes the default settlement currency for sanctioned energy trade is no longer far-fetched.

Market implications for energy and crypto

For crypto markets specifically, stablecoins used in sanctioned trade corridors occupy a legal gray zone. Rising adoption in cross-border energy settlements validates the core utility thesis for digital assets, but it also paints a target on specific tokens and protocols that facilitate these transactions.

Secondary sanctions present the wildcard scenario. If the US follows tariffs with enforcement actions against Chinese firms handling Russian energy payments, those firms face a binary choice: comply with US demands and lose Russian business, or find settlement methods that sit outside the reach of US regulators.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.