Coinbase CEO warns of potential AI risks within two years

Brian Armstrong thinks an AI model is going to go rogue within the next year or two. The Coinbase CEO shared this prediction on X, comparing the hypothetical event to one of the internet’s earliest and most famous security disasters.

Armstrong specifically referenced the Morris Worm of 1988, which infected roughly 10% of all machines connected to ARPANET, the precursor to the modern internet. His argument: something similar is coming for AI, it will dominate headlines for a news cycle, and then humanity will figure it out and move on.

The Morris Worm playbook

For those who weren’t following cybersecurity news in the late Reagan era, the Morris Worm was created by a Cornell graduate student named Robert Tappan Morris. It was one of the first computer worms distributed via the internet and it brought a meaningful chunk of the early network to its knees.

Armstrong’s analogy is deliberate. The Morris Worm generated panic at the time. Congress held hearings. Morris himself became the first person convicted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. And then, over the following decades, the internet became the backbone of modern civilization anyway.

That’s essentially Armstrong’s thesis here. A rogue AI model, whatever form it takes, would generate what he described as “big deal” headlines. But in the grand sweep of technological history, Armstrong believes the incident would register as a “blip on the radar.” Society adapts. Defenses get built. The technology keeps advancing.

Where AI meets crypto in Armstrong’s worldview

He has consistently described AI and crypto as the “two most important technology trends” of the current era, and he sees them as deeply complementary rather than competitive. His framework is simple: AI is programmable intelligence, crypto is programmable money.

Coinbase has been aggressively integrating AI tools across its operations, including mandatory use of coding assistants for employees, and its Layer 2 network Base has seen growing transaction volumes driven in part by AI-related activity.

The broader AI risk debate

After the 1988 incident, the response wasn’t to shut down the internet. It was to create CERT, the Computer Emergency Response Team, and to invest heavily in network security. The worm essentially created an entire industry. Armstrong seems to be betting that a rogue AI incident would follow the same pattern: initial chaos, followed by institutional response, followed by a more resilient ecosystem.

For crypto market participants, the warning carries a specific subtext. If a rogue AI event triggers widespread panic, the resulting volatility could hit digital assets hard in the short term, particularly if regulators use the moment to push for broader technology restrictions that sweep crypto into the net.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.