3 hours ago
18
The legal safety net protecting professionals overseeing Voyager Digital’s bankruptcy just got yanked away. US District Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain vacated the exculpation provisions in Voyager’s confirmed Chapter 11 liquidation plan, ruling that the bankruptcy court simply didn’t have the authority to shield parties from future civil or criminal liability for actions taken during plan implementation.
The ruling came after the US Department of Justice and the US Trustee appealed the protections, which had been designed to insulate a broad cast of characters, including debtors, committee members, Plan Administrator Michael Wyse, the Distribution Agent, released professionals, and employees, from lawsuits related to rebalancing transactions and distributing digital assets to customers.
What the exculpation clause actually did
Voyager’s version was narrower than some. It carved out exceptions for actual fraud, willful misconduct, and gross negligence. So the protection only applied to good-faith actions taken in the ordinary course of executing the plan. Still, Judge Swain found it went too far.
The core issue: whether a bankruptcy court can grant what amounts to a prospective liability shield for future conduct. Judge Swain concluded it cannot. The bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction doesn’t extend to preemptively blocking claims that haven’t even arisen yet, particularly when those claims might involve actions taken well after the plan was confirmed.
The DOJ and US Trustee specifically challenged protections covering the handling of customer distributions of digital assets. In a bankruptcy involving crypto, those distributions involve complex decisions about token conversions, timing of sales, and allocation methods.
Voyager’s long road through bankruptcy
Voyager filed for Chapter 11 protection on July 5, 2022, one of several crypto platforms that collapsed during that year’s brutal market downturn. The immediate trigger was a defaulted loan to Three Arrows Capital, the Singapore-based hedge fund whose spectacular implosion became one of crypto’s defining cautionary tales.
The company’s liquidation plan was confirmed in March 2023. Originally, the plan contemplated asset sales, potentially to another platform that could continue serving Voyager’s customers. That didn’t materialize. The process shifted to full liquidation, meaning assets would be sold off and proceeds distributed to creditors.
The latest status report from Plan Administrator Wyse was filed on February 27, 2026, more than three and a half years after the original bankruptcy filing. The liquidation process remains ongoing.
Voyager and the official committee of unsecured creditors didn’t take the ruling quietly. Both filed appeal notices within days, pushing the case to the Second Circuit.
Why this matters beyond Voyager
The broader crypto bankruptcy landscape is watching closely. Voyager isn’t unique. The 2022 crypto winter produced a wave of insolvencies, including Celsius, FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis, each with their own complex liquidation plans and their own versions of exculpation clauses. If the Second Circuit upholds Judge Swain’s reasoning, it could force restructuring of liability protections across multiple ongoing cases.
The Second Circuit’s eventual decision on Voyager’s appeal will be one of the more consequential rulings in crypto insolvency law. If the appellate court agrees that bankruptcy courts lack jurisdiction to grant prospective exculpation, it would establish binding precedent across New York’s federal courts, home to many of the largest crypto bankruptcy cases. If it reverses, it would provide clearer legal footing for the protections that make complex liquidations practically feasible.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·