Crypto industry blames Trump for failed landmark bill in Senate

The crypto industry’s best shot at a comprehensive regulatory framework just flatlined on the Senate floor. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which would have given the CFTC primary oversight of digital assets, failed 49-50 on September 15, with every single Democrat voting against it and four Republican senators crossing the aisle to join them.

The bill had already cleared the House. It was supposed to be the finish line.

How Trump’s crypto profits poisoned the well

Democrats’ opposition centered on what they called insufficient ethics provisions in the legislation. President Trump disclosed earnings exceeding $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures in 2025, a figure that includes revenue from the controversial $TRUMP memecoin.

That number gave Democratic senators a concrete, politically potent reason to demand guardrails on officials profiting from the very assets Congress was trying to regulate. When Republicans declined to add those provisions, Democrats walked away unanimously.

Some crypto industry leaders are now pointing the finger directly at the White House. The reasoning is straightforward: had Trump not been so deeply and publicly entangled in crypto ventures, Democrats might have been willing to negotiate on a bill that many of them had previously signaled interest in.

What the Clarity Act would have done

The legislation represented the most ambitious attempt yet to create a unified federal regulatory framework for digital assets. At its core, the bill would have established the CFTC as the primary regulator for most crypto tokens, resolving years of jurisdictional turf wars between the CFTC and the SEC.

The SEC treats most tokens as securities, which subjects them to strict disclosure and registration requirements. The CFTC, by contrast, regulates commodities and derivatives with a lighter touch that the industry generally prefers.

Congress is heading into recess ahead of midterm elections, which means the Clarity Act is effectively dead for this legislative session.

Market fallout and the regulatory vacuum

Crypto-related stocks and tokens declined following the procedural defeat, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to regulatory developments in Washington.

Without federal legislation, the SEC and CFTC will continue navigating digital asset policy through existing frameworks, essentially regulation by enforcement. That approach has drawn criticism from both the industry and some lawmakers who argue it creates uncertainty and puts the US at a competitive disadvantage relative to jurisdictions like the EU, which implemented its comprehensive MiCA framework.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.