Governance in DeFi is only as credible as the rules behind it. Hey Anon, the AI-driven DeFi agent launchpad, spelled those rules out clearly on July 22, announcing the eligibility criteria that will determine who gets a say in its upcoming DAO vote scheduled for July 23, 2026.
The criteria are specific: ANON token holders qualify to vote if their tokens are staked on Sonic, Base, Ethereum, or Solana, or locked in Kava contracts. Silo deposits and liquidity provider positions on Solana are explicitly excluded from the count.
What qualifies and what does not
Kava contracts are included in the eligible set, with one carve-out. Silo deposits on Kava do not qualify, drawing the same logic as LP exclusions.
The ANON token has a total supply of 20.8 million, with vesting schedules that run through 2029. That relatively tight supply, combined with staking requirements for governance participation, means the pool of eligible voters is deliberately concentrated among long-term aligned holders.
Anon DAO’s governance arc
This is not Hey Anon’s first DAO vote. The project ran its initial governance vote in January 2025, establishing the multi-chain framework that tomorrow’s vote builds on.
The project currently integrates with over 18 blockchain networks and 25 DeFi protocols. Developers working within the ecosystem have access to Automate, a TypeScript framework that facilitates protocol integration.
ANON is positioned as the primary governance token for Anon DAO, giving holders influence over platform development decisions and broader ecosystem resource allocation. The token also unlocks discounted access to services within the platform.
What this means for ANON holders
The most immediate implication is behavioral. If you hold ANON in an LP position or in a Silo deposit, tomorrow’s vote does not include you.
What to watch after July 23 is whether the vote outcome shapes the next eligibility revision. With vesting schedules running to 2029, the composition of the eligible voter base will shift as more tokens unlock.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

2 hours ago
25









English (US) ·