Iran and Oman strike deal on Strait of Hormuz management and revenue sharing

Iran and Oman have finalized agreements on how to manage and split revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway that normally handles roughly 20% of the world’s oil and LNG shipments. The deal, reached during talks on August 25-26 in Tehran, represents the most concrete step yet toward reopening a passage that has been heavily restricted since early 2026.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and his Omani counterpart Badr Albusaidi hammered out a framework that includes a temporary joint navigational corridor and coordinated mine-clearing operations expected to unfold over the next 30 to 60 days.

How the corridor would work

The proposed framework delineates shipping routes in a surprisingly tidy fashion: inbound traffic would traverse Iranian waters, while outbound traffic would use Omani waters. That geographic split creates the basis for shared revenue, since each nation would effectively provide passage services on its side of the strait.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards spokesperson confirmed on August 26 that the agreements address both the “share of Hormuz and revenues.” The IRGC has claimed that potential annual revenues could reach billions of dollars from service fees tied to security and navigational services, assuming the framework gets fully implemented.

The mine-clearing operations are particularly notable. Joint demining signals a level of military cooperation between Tehran and Muscat that would have seemed improbable even a year ago. It also underscores just how dangerous the strait has become during the period of restricted traffic, with unexploded ordnance posing risks to commercial vessels attempting passage.

The US factor

Washington looms large over these negotiations. A prior memorandum of understanding from June 2026 still technically governs the strait, and Iran has insisted that the US fulfill its commitments under that MOU before any full reopening takes place. Those commitments reportedly include lifting blockades.

The June MOU included a 60-day toll-free period, a concession that has apparently expired or is nearing expiration. Iran’s position is essentially: we agreed to let ships through for free as a goodwill gesture, now it’s your turn to deliver.

Energy market implications

For global energy markets, the timing matters enormously. With the strait handling around a fifth of the world’s oil and LNG trade under normal conditions, the heavy restrictions in place since early 2026 have contributed to supply uncertainty and price volatility. Even a partial reopening through a managed corridor could relieve some of that pressure.

The revenue model itself is worth parsing. Service fees for security and navigation through a managed corridor would effectively create a toll system on one of the world’s most important trade routes. If the “billions” figure cited by the IRGC is even directionally accurate, it represents a substantial new income stream for both Iran and Oman.

Iran’s insistence on US compliance with prior commitments means the framework could stall if Washington doesn’t play along. And the IRGC’s involvement in the revenue discussion adds a sanctions dimension that could complicate participation by Western shipping companies and insurers.

For energy importers in Asia, particularly China, Japan, and South Korea, any progress on reopening the strait is welcome news. These economies depend heavily on Gulf oil flowing through Hormuz, and they’ve been forced to seek alternative supply routes at higher cost.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.