Iran vows retaliation after US expands sanctions targeting digital assets, gold, and shipping

The US just turned the economic screws on Iran to a degree that makes previous rounds look like gentle nudges. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a sweeping new sanctions package on August 24, dubbed “Operation Economic Outcast,” targeting five sectors: digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping.

Iran’s response was roughly what you’d expect from a country being told its economy is about to get kneecapped. Officials warned that any nation cooperating with the new measures would be committing an “act of war.”

What the sanctions actually do

The package designates approximately 60 individuals, entities, and vessels across the five targeted sectors. That’s a wide net, and it’s designed to do more than just squeeze Iran directly.

The real teeth are in the secondary sanctions warnings. These target foreign companies and institutions that continue doing business with Iran, essentially forcing third-party nations to choose sides. Washington set a compliance timeline for enforcement, giving trading partners a window to wind down their Iranian exposure before penalties kick in.

Notably, the US stopped short of slapping sanctions directly on major Iranian trading partners like China. For now. That’s a calculated move: threatening secondary sanctions gives Washington leverage without immediately triggering a trade confrontation with Beijing.

China, for its part, has already pushed back. Beijing officially stated that the sanctions “do not help” and affirmed its commitment to protecting Chinese interests in Iran. Russia has expressed similar dissent, which could complicate enforcement significantly given that both nations represent substantial portions of Iran’s remaining trade lifelines.

Tehran’s response: threats of oil disruption and military escalation

Iranian officials did not mince words. Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei both issued sharp warnings, framing the situation in existential terms.

The most consequential threat involves oil. Iran suggested it could halt oil exports from the Persian Gulf, a move that would ripple through global energy markets with force. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, has long been Iran’s trump card in geopolitical standoffs.

Iranian officials described their potential response as “seismic” and “earthquake-like,” signaling a shift toward a more aggressive defense posture. Shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz has already declined, and military tensions in the region have been escalating alongside ongoing US-Israel operations against Iranian interests.

The UAE’s decision to end trade with Iran days before the sanctions announcement adds another layer. The timing suggests coordination with Washington, effectively shrinking Iran’s regional economic footprint before the formal designation even hit.

The digital asset dimension

The inclusion of digital assets as one of the five targeted sectors is significant. Iran has increasingly turned to crypto as a mechanism to circumvent previous sanctions regimes, using it to facilitate cross-border transactions that traditional banking channels can no longer support.

By explicitly naming digital assets in the sanctions framework, the US is putting exchanges, OTC desks, and DeFi protocols on notice. Any entity found facilitating transactions tied to sanctioned Iranian individuals or organizations could face secondary sanctions penalties. That creates compliance headaches not just for centralized exchanges, which already screen for OFAC-listed addresses, but potentially for decentralized infrastructure that lacks the same gatekeeping mechanisms.

What comes next

China’s posture is the variable that matters most. If Beijing continues purchasing Iranian crude in defiance of secondary sanctions, Washington faces an uncomfortable choice: enforce the penalties against Chinese entities and risk escalating trade tensions, or let the sanctions lose credibility through selective enforcement.

Iran’s willingness to frame compliance as a casus belli raises the stakes beyond economics. With diplomatic channels between Washington and Tehran effectively frozen, and military operations in the region ongoing, the margin for miscalculation is uncomfortably thin.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.