Mirae disputes Bloomberg report on SpaceX IPO coordination

Mirae Asset Securities, South Korea’s largest brokerage, is pushing back hard against a Bloomberg News report that portrayed the firm as bungling its role in SpaceX’s initial public offering. The firm says it did everything right, coordinated with lead underwriters, and has the receipts to prove it.

What actually happened

According to Mirae, the firm submitted binding orders totaling $1.14 billion between June 5 and June 10, following the instructions provided by lead underwriters. The brokerage says it received confirmation that those orders were properly logged.

Then came the Bloomberg report on June 30, which claimed Mirae received zero allocation due to a “misunderstanding” regarding order submissions. Mirae has labeled the Bloomberg report as “malicious” and “defamatory,” and is now considering legal action against the outlet.

The fallout is already significant

Mirae publicly apologized to its clients on July 1, acknowledging the reality that they had been promised access to SpaceX shares and received nothing. The firm indicated it may offer financial compensation to affected clients.

South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service has expanded its investigation beyond the immediate allocation failure. The regulator was already looking into the situation, but the scope has now broadened.

Mirae was the only member of the underwriting syndicate not to receive any shares in SpaceX’s IPO. In a typical IPO syndicate, shares are distributed among participating underwriters based on their order sizes, relationships, and roles. For every other member to receive shares while Mirae got nothing suggests something broke down at a fundamental level.

What this means for investors

For individual investors who were counting on Mirae to deliver SpaceX shares, the immediate concern is compensation. The brokerage’s willingness to discuss financial remedies suggests it recognizes the liability exposure, but the details of any compensation program remain to be seen.

If Mirae’s account holds up — that it followed instructions, submitted orders on time, and received confirmations — then the fault lies elsewhere in the chain. That outcome would put pressure on lead underwriters to explain their allocation decisions. If the Bloomberg account proves more accurate, the lesson is simpler: even the biggest players can stumble on operational basics when the stakes are high enough.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.