Pantera leads $6 million seed round for TurboFlow

TurboFlow has closed a $6M seed round led by Pantera Capital to build a trading platform combining prediction markets and perpetual futures, specifically targeting the Asia-Pacific region. The raise positions the startup as a would-be regional competitor to Western prediction market giants at a time when derivatives trading volumes across crypto are hitting record levels.

The pitch is straightforward: Asian traders want the same products that Kalshi and Polymarket offer, but with infrastructure designed for their regulatory environments and trading preferences.

What TurboFlow is building

The platform runs on a custom Layer-1 blockchain and offers two core products: prediction markets and perpetual futures. Both sit under a single trading interface, which is a deliberate design choice to capture users who want event-based speculation alongside traditional leverage trading.

The leverage on offer is aggressive. TurboFlow supports up to 1,000x leverage on its perpetual futures, a number that will raise eyebrows even among seasoned derivatives traders. For context, most major centralized exchanges cap leverage at 100x to 125x, and many DeFi protocols stay well below that threshold.

Zero-fee trading is another headline feature. The platform intends to eliminate trading fees entirely, which, if sustained, would represent a meaningful differentiator in a market where fee compression has already become a competitive battleground among exchanges.

Liquidity is being addressed through an oracle-based Automated Market Maker. Rather than relying purely on order books where buyers and sellers meet directly, TurboFlow uses external price feeds to help set prices and ensure there’s always liquidity available for traders.

In May 2026, the company announced a partnership with SIG Crypto, the digital assets arm of Susquehanna International Group, one of the largest quantitative trading firms in the world. That collaboration focuses on market-making and liquidity services.

Why APAC, and why now

Perpetual futures trading volumes exceeded $86 trillion in 2025, reflecting explosive growth in a product category that barely existed a decade ago. Much of that volume has been concentrated on platforms with primarily Western user bases or global-but-not-localized operations.

Polymarket, which became the dominant prediction market platform in the US after its breakout during the 2024 US presidential election cycle, has limited presence in Asia. Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated prediction exchange, is even more US-centric by design.

What this means for investors and the competitive landscape

The combination of prediction markets and perpetual futures on a single platform is worth watching. These two products have historically lived in separate ecosystems. Prediction markets are event-driven and attract a different user profile than leverage traders.

The 1,000x leverage figure deserves scrutiny. Ultra-high leverage has been a recurring source of controversy in crypto, frequently cited by regulators as evidence of insufficient consumer protection. How TurboFlow navigates this in a region where countries like Japan, South Korea, and Singapore have increasingly strict frameworks for crypto derivatives will be a defining challenge.

The zero-fee model also raises sustainability questions. Exchanges that have tried zero-fee approaches in the past, including some brief experiments by Binance and BitMEX, have typically reverted to fee-based models once initial user acquisition goals were met.

The SIG Crypto partnership is perhaps the most telling detail. Institutional market makers don’t commit resources to platforms they view as short-lived experiments. Their involvement suggests TurboFlow has cleared at least some internal due diligence bars around technology, compliance, and market potential.

With $6M in the bank, TurboFlow has enough runway to launch and prove initial traction, but not enough to weather a prolonged user acquisition battle against well-funded competitors.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.