Payward wins $22M arbitration against auditor Mazars over audit withdrawal

Payward Inc., the parent company behind crypto exchange Kraken, just won a $22 million arbitration award against its former auditor Mazars USA. The reason: Mazars pulled out of Kraken’s 2022 financial audit days before completing it, despite having found no fraud, no management disagreements, and no integrity issues.

Think of it like a home inspector walking off the job right before signing the final report, then leaving the homeowner to explain to every bank why the paperwork is incomplete. Except in this case, the “home” is one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world, and the banks are state regulators holding the keys to money transmitter licenses.

What actually happened

Here’s the timeline that matters. Mazars had been auditing Payward for three years, issuing clean opinions for the prior two. Then in November 2023, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Kraken. Days later, in December 2023, Mazars abruptly withdrew from the 2022 audit.

No findings of fraud. No disagreements with management. No red flags. Just a sudden exit that, according to Payward, created an unearned “cloud” of doubt over the entire company.

The arbitrator agreed that Mazars’ departure caused real, quantifiable damage. Of the $22 million award, $12.5 million was tied specifically to Kraken’s acquisition of TradeStation Crypto, a deal that was apparently complicated by the audit vacuum Mazars left behind.

Payward co-CEO Arjun Sethi has made clear the company views the withdrawal as far more than an inconvenience. The firm argues it triggered what they describe as a “licensing crisis,” forcing Kraken to spend significant legal resources simply to restore confidence with state regulators and banking partners.

Payward filed to enforce the arbitration ruling through the Delaware Court of Chancery on July 7, 2026. The arbitration itself had been confidential until the enforcement filing brought it into public view.

The bigger picture for crypto auditing

Look, the timing of Mazars’ exit is what makes this story worth paying attention to. The firm didn’t withdraw because it found problems. It withdrew right after the SEC came knocking at Kraken’s door.

This fits a pattern that plagued the crypto industry throughout 2023 and into 2024. Major accounting and consulting firms, spooked by regulatory scrutiny and reputational risk, quietly distanced themselves from crypto clients. Mazars itself had previously pulled back from providing proof-of-reserves reports for Binance in late 2022, citing concerns about the way those reports were being interpreted by the public.

The problem is straightforward. When auditors flee crypto companies not because of actual findings but because of regulatory optics, it creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Regulators see an incomplete audit and assume the worst. Banks get nervous. License renewals become battles. The company ends up paying the price for someone else’s risk calculus.

That the SEC lawsuit against Kraken was later dismissed in March 2025 only sharpens the irony. Mazars walked away from a client that, by all available evidence, was operating cleanly, and the regulatory action that apparently spooked the auditor didn’t even stick.

For context, Mazars USA is now part of the combined entity Forvis Mazars, following a merger that reshaped the firm’s global footprint. Whether this arbitration loss influences how the combined firm approaches crypto engagements going forward remains to be seen.

What this means for investors and the industry

The $22 million award is meaningful, but probably not in the way you’d expect. It’s not going to move Kraken’s bottom line in any dramatic fashion. The real significance is precedent.

This is one of the first high-profile cases where a crypto company successfully held an auditor financially accountable for walking away. In an industry that has spent years begging for the legitimacy that comes with proper audits and financial oversight, the message is clear: if you take the engagement, you finish the engagement, or you pay for the consequences of leaving.

For other crypto firms navigating similar relationships with auditors, this ruling provides a template. Auditing agreements carry contractual obligations, and the arbitrator’s decision suggests those obligations don’t evaporate just because a regulator files a complaint against the client.

The market reaction to the news has been muted so far. No significant price moves for any Kraken-related assets, no wave of analyst commentary. That’s partly because Kraken remains a private company, so there’s no publicly traded stock to react. But it’s also because the crypto market in mid-2026 has bigger things on its mind than a two-year-old audit dispute, however consequential it may be structurally.

Here’s the thing worth watching, though. The crypto industry’s audit problem hasn’t gone away. Firms still struggle to find willing, qualified auditors. If this arbitration outcome encourages accounting firms to think twice before abandoning crypto clients at the first sign of regulatory heat, it could have a quietly stabilizing effect on the sector’s institutional infrastructure. The companies that can reliably complete audits and maintain clean financial reporting will have a meaningful edge in securing banking relationships and state-level licenses, two things that remain genuine chokepoints for crypto businesses operating in the US.

For Kraken specifically, the enforcement filing in Delaware signals that Payward intends to collect. And given that the arbitration found no underlying fraud or misconduct on Kraken’s part, the exchange walks away from this episode with both the money and the narrative vindication.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.