Polymarket wants back into America’s good graces, and it is not being subtle about it. The prediction market platform, banned from serving US users in 2022 after a $1.4 million CFTC settlement for running an unregistered derivatives exchange, is now running a full-court press: influencer deals, a Major League Baseball sponsorship, and outreach to major news networks including CNBC and CNN.
The timing is deliberate. Polymarket launched a regulated US version of its platform in December 2025, made possible through the acquisition of QCEX. The company is now betting that a loud enough marketing campaign can reintroduce it to the American public as a legitimate, above-board operation rather than the offshore workaround it spent four years being.
The numbers that make this complicated
Here is the tension at the center of this story. Polymarket was banned from the US market. The ban did not actually stop US users from trading on the platform.
In April 2026 alone, the offshore version of Polymarket recorded roughly $9 billion in trading volume. US-linked wallets accounted for approximately 30% of that activity. The regulated US app, Polymarket US, generated about $1.6 billion in volume during the same month.
Over the last 12 months, Polymarket users placed $571 million in political market trades alone, according to Allium analysis.
Shayne Coplan, Polymarket’s founder, has connections that add another layer to the story. Donald Trump Jr. serves as both an advisor and an investor in the platform, a relationship that will draw scrutiny from any regulator or journalist inclined to look closely at who is benefiting from a friendlier post-2024 regulatory environment.
A WSJ report lands at exactly the wrong moment
A Wall Street Journal investigation published June 20, 2026 reported on what it described as deceptive marketing tactics by Polymarket. The fallout was fast: a consumer lawsuit followed, and the CFTC expanded its investigation into the company.
The core compliance question raised by the WSJ report is whether Polymarket’s marketing practices were truthful about what users were signing up for, and what protections they had. Those are questions that matter both for the ongoing CFTC investigation and for any future regulatory framework that governs prediction markets in the US.
What this means for prediction markets broadly
The $9 billion in offshore monthly volume signals that demand for prediction markets is real, deep, and not going away simply because a regulator draws a line.
The CFTC investigation is ongoing, the consumer lawsuit is live, and the WSJ report has given any skeptical regulator fresh ammunition. The regulated app’s $1.6 billion April volume suggests some are already comfortable with that bet, but the offshore platform’s continued dominance of total volume tells you most sophisticated users are still keeping their options open.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

1 hour ago
9









English (US) ·