1 hour ago
13
A token launchpad that didn’t exist two months ago just out-earned some of the most established names in decentralized finance. Pons, the permissionless token creation platform built for Robinhood Chain, pulled in $950K in protocol revenue in a single day, placing it ahead of Jupiter, Axiom Pro, and Polymarket.
That daily haul ranked Pons somewhere between 7th and 8th among all protocols by revenue. For a platform that launched alongside a brand-new Layer 2 network on July 1, 2026, the trajectory is steep enough to raise eyebrows across the broader DeFi landscape.
How a launchpad nobody heard of became a revenue machine
Pons operates with a simple premise: anyone can create a fixed-supply token, which then trades against WETH and other assets in locked liquidity pools. No gatekeepers, no approval processes.
The revenue model has two layers. There’s a launch fee, set at 0.0005 ETH per token in its first version. Then there’s a 1% trading fee applied to every swap, split in a way that gives creators a meaningful share of the action.
What makes the economics particularly aggressive is where 80% of that protocol revenue goes. Rather than sitting in a treasury or flowing to a team wallet, the vast majority gets routed into automated buybacks and burns of the native $PONS token.
The $PONS token market cap swung from roughly $60M to nearly $400M within a single week, a gain that correlates tightly with the spike in platform activity and the mechanical buying pressure from the burn program.
Robinhood Chain’s memecoin moment
On peak days, more than 60% to 66% of all token launches on the Robinhood Chain happened through Pons, with the platform facilitating between 15,000 and 22,000 individual token creations during its busiest stretches.
Cumulative protocol revenue has already climbed into the tens of millions, with a 30-day snapshot showing roughly $5M flowing through the system.
Built on Arbitrum’s technology stack as an Ethereum Layer 2, the Robinhood Chain launched its mainnet on July 1, 2026. Pons arriving at nearly the same time gave it a first-mover advantage in capturing the initial wave of speculative interest that typically floods new blockchain ecosystems.
The sustainability question
The buyback-and-burn mechanism creates an interesting dynamic. When activity is high, 80% of revenue flows directly into reducing $PONS supply while simultaneously providing buy-side pressure. Any sustained decline in token launches or trading volume would reduce the buyback pressure just as quickly, potentially amplifying downside moves in the $PONS price.
The market cap swinging from $60M to $400M in a week illustrates both the upside potential and the volatility risk embedded in this model.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·