Solana Foundation launches on-chain governance proposals for stake-weighted community votes

Solana just got a formal way for its community to weigh in on the network’s future. The Solana Foundation has launched Solana Governance Proposals, or SGPs, an on-chain governance system that lets validators and SOL delegators cast stake-weighted votes on big-picture decisions for the protocol.

Think of it as Solana’s version of a shareholder vote, except instead of shares, your voting power comes from the amount of SOL you’ve staked. And unlike a typical corporate proxy vote, delegators can actually override their validator’s position on any given proposal. The Foundation is calling this “staker sovereignty.”

How the governance system works

The barrier to even propose something is steep. Validators need a minimum of 100,000 SOL, roughly $7.7 million at current prices, just to register an SGP.

Once a proposal is registered, it needs to clear two major hurdles before it can pass. First, at least 15% of active cluster stake must support the proposal before a formal vote even begins. Second, passage requires a two-thirds supermajority of voting stake.

All voting happens on-chain, recorded using Merkle proofs. In English: the cryptographic receipts are baked directly into the blockchain, making the results transparent and tamper-resistant.

The key innovation here is the delegator override mechanism. If you’ve staked your SOL with a validator and that validator votes one way on a proposal, you can use your own stake weight to vote the opposite direction. Your validator picks door A, you pick door B, and your portion of the stake counts toward door B.

The Foundation has set up dedicated infrastructure for the system. A governance dashboard lives at governance.solana.com, while documentation is available at docs.governance.solana.com.

SGPs vs. SIMDs: different tools for different jobs

Solana already has a governance process for technical changes called Solana Improvement Documents, or SIMDs. These handle the nuts-and-bolts engineering decisions: protocol upgrades, feature implementations, and technical specifications.

SGPs are designed to operate alongside SIMDs, not replace them. Where SIMDs deal with the “how” of building Solana, SGPs tackle the “what” and “why.” Strategic direction, high-level policy questions, and significant protocol decisions fall under the SGP umbrella. Solana aims to maintain core developer oversight over day-to-day engineering adjustments while the SGP framework handles higher-level community input.

What this means for SOL holders and investors

The 100,000 SOL threshold for proposal registration means this isn’t grassroots democracy. It’s governance by major stakeholders, with a mechanism for smaller delegators to have their say during the voting phase.

The 15% stake threshold for triggering a vote is high enough to filter out frivolous proposals but low enough that a coalition of mid-sized validators could theoretically push something to a vote without needing backing from the largest players.

The two-thirds supermajority requirement for passage is a deliberately high bar that makes it difficult for narrow majorities to push through controversial changes.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.