ETFs · Explained
US spot bitcoin ETFs swing to $430 million net outflow
Fidelity's FBTC flipped from a large inflow to a near-$200 million redemption, driving most of the day-to-day change, Farside data show.
Key takeaways
- Fidelity drove the swing. FBTC's move from a $236.7 million inflow to a $199.9 million outflow accounted for roughly 86.5% of the change in the industry total between the two sessions.
- BlackRock's outflow shrank. IBIT lost $201.2 million on 4 November and $105 million on 5 November, an improvement of $96.2 million even as the overall total worsened.
- The reversal was broader than one fund. Removing Fidelity's 5 November withdrawal still leaves a $230.3 million net outflow, and removing BlackRock as well leaves $125.3 million.
What happened
US spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds moved from a net inflow to a substantial net outflow in a single session, according to fund-level data from Farside Investors reported by Crypto.news. The funds took in $74.6 million on 4 November and then recorded $430.2 million in net withdrawals on 5 November.
Fidelity's FBTC was the largest single contributor to the change. The fund brought in $236.7 million on the first day and lost $199.9 million the next, a swing of $436.6 million across the two sessions. Crypto.news calculated that this accounted for about 86.5% of the shift in the industry total and about 46.5% of the second day's net withdrawals.
BlackRock's IBIT reported outflows on both dates, at $201.2 million and then $105 million. Its second-day redemption was smaller than the first by $96.2 million, partly offsetting the deterioration elsewhere.
Other funds also changed direction. Ark's ARKB went from a $19.9 million inflow to an $18.9 million outflow, and Grayscale's GBTC moved from zero net flow to a $49.9 million withdrawal. Franklin and VanEck were the exceptions on 5 November, recording inflows of $32.9 million and $23.6 million respectively, for a combined $56.5 million.
First $83.3KLatest $75.4K-9.4% over the period
Points are daily observations, not closing prices.
Why it matters
The figures illustrate how heavily a headline net flow number can depend on a small number of large funds. On 4 November, Fidelity's inflow alone exceeded the industry total, and stripping it out would have left the rest of the group at negative $162.1 million. The two largest opposing moves that day, Fidelity's inflow and BlackRock's outflow, totalled $437.9 million in absolute terms, almost six times the $74.6 million net result.
Crypto.news noted that the sign of the 5 November result does not depend on Fidelity. Excluding its withdrawal still leaves a $230.3 million net outflow, and excluding both Fidelity and BlackRock leaves $125.3 million, up from a positive $39.1 million for the same group a day earlier. That points to a wider change in direction rather than a single fund's reversal.
CryptoSlate reported the same $430 million outflow figure, citing Farside Investors, and placed it alongside a separate supply question: whether fund demand persists between concentrated buying periods.
What the data shows
On 4 November, Fidelity, Bitwise, Ark and Invesco reported inflows while BlackRock reported the only outflow. Bitwise added $15.2 million, ARKB $19.9 million and Invesco's BTCO $4 million. The four positive entries summed to $275.8 million, and BlackRock's $201.2 million withdrawal reduced that to the $74.6 million headline.
On 5 November, the four reported withdrawals, from BlackRock, Fidelity, Ark and GBTC, totalled $486.7 million. Subtracting the $56.5 million combined inflow from Franklin and VanEck leaves the $430.2 million net figure. The two largest funds by absolute movement reported a combined $304.9 million outflow, about 70.9% of the net total.
Background
The two sessions continued a weak stretch for the category. According to Crypto.news, the first four November sessions produced $869.8 million in net outflows, and the 4 November inflow reversed only part of that. The 5 November withdrawal was smaller than the $643 million exit reported for 30 October.
CryptoSlate, citing a 21Shares report published on 2 November, said ETF buyers added 79,800 BTC in the third quarter against 41,300 BTC newly mined. Most of that accumulation was concentrated in two windows, 17-27 August and 21-25 September, which together accounted for 91% of ETF inflows measured in bitcoin. The same report recorded a 248,000 BTC reduction in long-term-holder balances during the quarter, a net balance decline rather than a measured total of executed sales.
What is still unclear
CryptoSlate noted that ETF ownership and age-based holder cohorts may overlap and are not established as mutually exclusive, so the categories cannot simply be added into a market shortfall. It also cited Glassnode's long-term-holder metric, which showed a rolling 30-day change of roughly negative 151,885 BTC in a capture on 6 November labelled "24 hours ago." Because the metric tracks a rolling window and reflects spending versus coins maturing into the cohort, it does not establish sales during a particular session.
What to watch
CryptoSlate suggested that repeated ETF inflows alongside slower net distribution from older holders would be a more persuasive recovery signal, while persistent redemptions combined with continued distribution would weaken the case. For flow watchers, the coming sessions will show whether the 5 November reversal was a one-day event or part of a sustained shift.
Questions readers ask
How much did US spot bitcoin ETFs lose on 5 November?
They recorded $430.2 million in net withdrawals, according to Farside Investors data reported by Crypto.news and CryptoSlate, after a $74.6 million net inflow the previous day.
Which fund drove the change?
Fidelity's FBTC moved from a $236.7 million inflow to a $199.9 million outflow, accounting for about 86.5% of the swing in the industry total, per Crypto.news.
Did BlackRock's fund also see outflows?
Yes. IBIT lost $201.2 million on 4 November and $105 million on 5 November, a smaller redemption on the second day.