Supreme Court ruling expands presidential authority over FTC, threatens crypto regulator independence

The Supreme Court just handed the president a new lever of power over federal regulators, and the crypto industry should be paying very close attention.

In a 6-3 decision issued June 29, the Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter that the president can fire FTC commissioners at will, stripping away the “for cause” protections that have shielded independent agency leaders from political removal since 1935. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the opinion, which effectively overturns Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, a precedent that has anchored the independence of regulatory agencies for nearly 91 years.

The immediate effect: President Trump’s March 2025 dismissals of Democratic FTC commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya were upheld as constitutional.

Why crypto investors should care about an FTC case

The FTC is not the primary regulator of digital assets. But the legal architecture that protected FTC commissioners from at-will removal is the same architecture protecting leaders at the SEC and the CFTC. Both the SEC and CFTC operate under similar for-cause dismissal protections. The Court’s reasoning in Trump v. Slaughter emphasizes that direct presidential control over executive functions of regulatory agencies is constitutionally necessary.

That means roughly two dozen independent agencies could see their leadership structures fundamentally altered by this single ruling.

One notable exception: a companion ruling preserved the Federal Reserve’s independence.

The end of regulatory independence as we knew it

Humphrey’s Executor cemented that principle in 1935, when the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that FDR couldn’t fire a commissioner simply because he wanted his own people in place.

What this means for crypto investors

If SEC and CFTC commissioners can be removed at will, the regulatory framework for digital assets becomes inherently tied to presidential politics. Enforcement actions, rulemaking priorities, and even the definition of what counts as a security could fluctuate more sharply between administrations than they already do.

The Federal Reserve carve-out is worth watching closely. The Court’s willingness to preserve Fed independence while dismantling FTC protections suggests the justices are drawing distinctions based on institutional function and historical practice.

Investors monitoring this space should track not just policy announcements, but commissioner appointments and removals at the SEC and CFTC. Those personnel decisions, now unconstrained by for-cause protections, will be the leading indicators of where enforcement and rulemaking are headed.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.