1 hour ago
10
President Donald Trump said he would not oppose placing his family’s cryptocurrency-related businesses into a blind trust, a notable shift for a president who has spent years resisting the traditional ethics guardrails that his predecessors embraced. The concession, however, comes with caveats: Trump remains firmly opposed to legislative provisions he views as targeting his family’s specific crypto operations.
The statement lands in the middle of a heated Senate fight over the CLARITY Act, formally known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, where Democrats have been pushing for stricter ethics requirements that would force divestment or the creation of blind trusts for officials with significant digital asset holdings. Trump’s conditional openness to a qualified blind trust, or QBT, represents an attempt to thread a political needle: appear cooperative on governance without actually constraining the family’s crypto empire.
A $1.4 billion reason for scrutiny
The scale of the Trump family’s crypto income explains why ethics provisions have become a sticking point in the legislation. Financial disclosures dated June 30, 2026, paint a striking picture of just how profitable these ventures have become.
In 2025 alone, Trump reportedly earned between $500 million and $635 million from World Liberty Financial, the crypto company he co-founded with his sons. On top of that, meme coin licensing generated over $600 million. Combined, the family’s crypto-related income exceeded $1.4 billion in a single year.
World Liberty Financial, or WLF, isn’t a small side project. The company operates a blockchain-based USD stablecoin called USD1 and has attracted external investment from entities linked to the UAE. The Trump family initially held approximately 60% stakes in the venture, giving them significant control over its direction and profits.
The blind trust question
US presidents have been placing potentially conflicting assets into independent blind trusts since the 1970s. The idea is straightforward: hand your investments to an independent trustee who manages them without your knowledge, eliminating the temptation to make policy decisions that benefit your portfolio.
Trump broke from that tradition during his first term by transferring business control to his sons through a revocable trust, essentially keeping the assets within the family’s orbit rather than handing them to an independent party. The arrangement drew criticism but had no enforcement mechanism to prevent it.
A qualified blind trust would go further than what Trump has done previously. Under a QBT structure, an independent trustee would manage the assets without the president’s knowledge of specific holdings or transactions. Trump’s stated position, that he doesn’t engage in the management of these businesses and delegates that role to his sons, suggests he views a QBT as functionally similar to the current arrangement.
The legislative battle ahead
The CLARITY Act has become a proxy war over how far Congress can go in imposing ethics requirements on sitting presidents and their families. Democrats in the Senate want provisions that would mandate either full divestment or the establishment of blind trusts, specifically designed to address situations where officials have substantial crypto holdings.
Trump’s opposition to what he characterizes as targeted legislation reflects a broader concern within his political camp. The argument is that provisions written narrowly enough to capture the Trump family’s specific business structures amount to bills of attainder, legislation designed to punish specific individuals rather than establish general rules.
One critical detail in the current legislation: the ethics provisions in the CLARITY Act may expire in 2029. That built-in sunset clause means even if the strictest version passes, the requirements could lapse, potentially before the end of a second Trump term.
The stablecoin market adds another layer of complexity. USD1, WLF’s blockchain-based stablecoin, operates in a space that Congress is actively trying to regulate through multiple bills. Any stablecoin legislation could directly affect the value and viability of the Trump family’s flagship crypto product, creating an unusually direct link between presidential policy preferences and personal financial outcomes.
No new legislation specifically targeting the family’s crypto interests has passed as of early August 2026. The CLARITY Act remains the primary vehicle for addressing these concerns, and its final form will likely depend on whether Trump’s conditional acceptance of a blind trust satisfies enough Senate votes to move the bill forward.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
English (US) ·