CIA director makes secret trip to Moscow amid diplomatic efforts

CIA Director John Ratcliffe flew to Moscow on August 25 aboard a US military C-17 Globemaster III, spent roughly eight hours on the ground, and left. No press conference, no photo ops, no formal sit-down with Vladimir Putin. Just the kind of quiet, high-stakes visit that tends to make the rest of the world very nervous.

It was the first trip to Moscow by a serving CIA director since William Burns made the same journey in November 2021, weeks before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. That earlier visit carried a warning against invading. This one, nearly five years into the war, carried warnings of a different kind.

What happened on the ground

Ratcliffe’s aircraft departed Joint Base Andrews and stopped in Riga, Latvia, before landing at Vnukovo Airport in Moscow. The Kremlin confirmed the visit took place, describing it as involving “contacts between security services.” No meeting with President Putin occurred, at least not one either side chose to acknowledge.

The visit was quickly reported by CBS News and The New York Times after the fact, though neither the CIA nor the White House offered on-the-record commentary beyond the bare confirmation that Ratcliffe had traveled.

According to reporting on the trip, Ratcliffe delivered two core messages. The first was a warning against Russian military actions targeting NATO territory. The second was a push for Moscow to reduce its support for Iran, a demand that fits into a broader pattern of US diplomatic pressure across multiple geopolitical fronts simultaneously.

Why a CIA director and not a diplomat

Burns’ 2021 visit is the most relevant precedent. He traveled to Moscow that November to warn Russia against invading Ukraine. Russia invaded three months later.

The choice to send Ratcliffe rather than a State Department official suggests the US wanted to communicate something with a degree of deniability and discretion that formal diplomatic channels don’t provide. Intelligence-to-intelligence contacts allow both sides to exchange messages without either government being formally committed to a position.

The broader context

Ukraine has been conducting long-range strikes inside Russian territory, a significant escalation that has tested Moscow’s red lines and NATO’s appetite for risk. Russia, meanwhile, has continued its campaign of attrition in eastern Ukraine.

The warning against attacks on NATO territory is significant because it suggests US intelligence has information, or at least concerns, about potential Russian actions that could trigger Article 5 obligations.

Moscow and Tehran have deepened their military cooperation since the start of the Ukraine war, with Iran supplying drones and other weapons systems that Russia has used on the battlefield. Washington has been trying to drive a wedge between the two countries, and pressing Moscow to reduce its support for Iran is consistent with that strategy.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.