Inter Milan’s pursuit of Curtis Jones highlights how fan tokens react to transfer sagas

Inter Milan wants Curtis Jones. Liverpool doesn’t want to sell him. And somewhere in the middle of this valuation tug-of-war, fan token markets are quietly paying attention.

The Italian giants have now had at least two bids rejected for the Liverpool midfielder, with their most recent verbal offer of €25 million falling well short of Liverpool’s €40 million asking price. Inter is reportedly preparing a third, improved bid, but the gap between what they’re willing to pay and what Liverpool will accept remains significant enough that Inter director Piero Ausilio has acknowledged an agreement is becoming “increasingly unlikely.”

The valuation standoff

Liverpool sees a 25-year-old England international who came through their academy and believes €40 million (roughly £35 million) is the floor. Inter sees the same player but notes he’s entering the final year of his contract, expiring in summer 2027, and believes that timeline should work in their favor.

Earlier bids from Inter ranged between £17 million and £21 million, so the €25 million offer did represent an escalation. Just not enough of one.

When a player has one year left on his deal, the selling club’s leverage erodes with every passing month. If Liverpool can’t get Jones to sign an extension, they risk losing him for nothing in 2027.

Why crypto markets care about football transfers

The parallel to digital asset valuation isn’t just a cute analogy. It’s increasingly literal. Major football clubs now have fan tokens, blockchain-based digital assets that give holders voting rights on minor club decisions and serve as a speculative vehicle tied to a club’s fortunes.

Inter Milan operates in this space, and high-profile transfer activity, whether incoming or outgoing, can influence trading volumes for these tokens. The logic is straightforward: a marquee signing suggests ambition, which generates fan enthusiasm, which drives token demand.

What this means for investors watching sports tokens

The Jones saga illustrates a dynamic that crypto-native investors should understand: the valuation frameworks in football transfers mirror many of the debates that happen in token markets. Liverpool is essentially arguing intrinsic value, pointing to Jones’s age, talent, and potential. Inter is arguing market value, noting that contract dynamics and comparable transactions suggest a lower number.

Inter’s willingness to submit multiple escalating bids for Jones signals ambition, which is generally positive for token sentiment. But if the club ultimately fails to land their target and doesn’t secure an alternative of similar caliber, that narrative can flip quickly.

Every month that passes without a contract extension shifts leverage toward Inter, and toward any other club willing to wait Jones out.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.