Katie Miller criticizes AI chatbots while holding $1M in xAI

Katie Miller has spent the better part of a year waging a one-woman war against the biggest names in artificial intelligence. OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, Google’s Gemini: all of them, in her telling, are dangerously biased, ideologically captured, and unfit for public consumption. What she hasn’t told her audience is that she holds roughly $1 million in stock in the company selling what she frames as the solution.

That company is xAI, Elon Musk’s AI venture and maker of the Grok chatbot. The Washington Post reported the undisclosed stake on September 10, raising pointed questions about the line between political commentary and paid promotion.

The campaign by the numbers

Since December 2025, Miller has published approximately 500 posts targeting AI chatbots made by xAI’s direct competitors. The criticisms hit a familiar rotation: the models are too liberal, they produce “woke” outputs, they pose safety risks to children, and they’ve been linked to harmful outcomes including suicide-related incidents.

Miller’s professional history makes the arrangement particularly awkward. She served as a special government employee with Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from 2024 through May 2025, working as a communications liaison. After leaving that role, she moved into communications work at xAI itself. Her husband, Stephen Miller, serves as deputy chief of staff in the White House.

The disclosure problem

The Federal Trade Commission has spent years trying to get social media personalities to clearly label paid partnerships and material connections. The basic principle is straightforward: if you have a financial interest in something you’re promoting, your audience deserves to know.

The $1 million stake in xAI isn’t pocket change, but it’s also not the kind of position that would show up on a public filing. xAI is a private company. There’s no SEC-mandated disclosure, no quarterly earnings call where the holding would surface. Without the Washington Post’s reporting, followers consuming Miller’s nearly 500 anti-competitor posts would have had no way to assess whether her recommendations were driven by genuine conviction or portfolio management.

Why the AI bias debate matters beyond the disclosure

Strip away the conflict-of-interest angle and there is a real debate underneath Miller’s posts. The question of whether large language models carry ideological biases is legitimate, and researchers across the political spectrum have raised it. But the debate loses credibility when its most vocal participants have undisclosed financial incentives to steer it in a particular direction.

Miller’s career arc—from Trump administration communications to DOGE liaison to xAI employee to independent commentator with an undisclosed equity stake—reflects a broader pattern of political operatives becoming de facto technology policymakers through the force of their platforms. Following her departure from direct roles with Musk, Miller launched The Katie Miller Podcast, which caters to conservative women.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.