The MNI Chicago Business Barometer hit 62.7 in May, blowing past the consensus estimate of 50.3 by a margin that makes most economic forecasts look like darts thrown blindfolded. For context, a reading above 50 signals expansion. A reading above 60 signals something closer to a manufacturing boom.
Just one month ago, the index sat at 49.2, technically in contraction territory. In English: the Chicago-area economy went from shrinking to sprinting in roughly 30 days.
What the numbers actually mean
The Chicago PMI, produced by MNI Indicators in partnership with ISM-Chicago, surveys purchasing professionals across the Chicago region. Think of it as a monthly health checkup for manufacturing and business activity in one of America’s most economically significant metro areas.
Released on May 29 at 9:45 a.m. ET, the number landed like a cold splash of water on anyone positioned for continued softness. The consensus estimate hovered between 50.3 and 50.6, essentially expecting the economy to flatline at the expansion-contraction boundary. Instead, it vaulted more than 12 points above expectations.
Why a regional index matters nationally
The index has historically served as a leading indicator for broader US economic health, often previewing the direction of national manufacturing surveys like the ISM Manufacturing Index. Strong readings have historically preceded broader US economic growth, which is why traders and institutional investors watch this number closely despite its regional focus.
The Chicago Business Barometer has been compiled monthly by MNI Indicators in collaboration with ISM-Chicago for over seven decades. The index aggregates various sub-indices, including New Orders, Production, Employment, Order Backlogs, and Supplier Deliveries.
What this means for investors
For now, the 62.7 print reshapes the near-term conversation. The flip side deserves attention: unexpectedly strong economic data can also prompt concerns about monetary policy. If the economy is running hotter than expected, central bankers have less incentive to cut interest rates and more reason to maintain a restrictive stance, creating potential headwinds for rate-sensitive assets.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

43 minutes ago
9








English (US) ·