Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi has publicly stated that the ongoing war on Iran has not met its officially assigned objectives and lacks a United Nations mandate. This conflict, initiated by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2026, aimed to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities and reduce its military strength. Despite these goals, Al Busaidi emphasized that the situation remains unresolved, with Iran’s nuclear program still active and the government operational. The lack of a UN mandate for these actions has also been highlighted, indicating a legal vacuum under international law that complicates the conflict’s legitimacy.
Key Takeaways
- Oman’s Foreign Minister’s statement appears to suggest that the conflict’s aims remain unfulfilled, consistent with a perception of stalled progress.
- The lack of a UN mandate as noted by Al Busaidi may indicate legal challenges to the US-Israeli actions, potentially affecting diplomatic dynamics.
- Market pricing suggests a reduction in optimism for a US-Iran nuclear deal, with probabilities for agreements by August 13, 2026, reflecting decreased confidence.
What to Watch
Markets will be closely observing any further diplomatic movements or statements from key actors, including the P5+1, Iran, and the United States, which could influence the likelihood of a nuclear deal. The stance of international bodies like the UN might also shift perceptions if new resolutions or mandates are introduced. Continued military engagements or diplomatic breakdowns could further impact the odds of a resolution by the specified dates.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

4 hours ago
10









English (US) ·