Quantum computing is great, but it can’t hack bitcoin…. not yet, anyway
So, to reassure everyone (mostly Bitcoiners) who got a little worried about recent news regarding quantum computing, here there are 4 reasons why quantum computers can’t hack Bitcoin:
- Quantum Gym Membership: Right now, quantum computers are like teenage gym newbies-—-they’ve got potential but aren’t quite ready to lift the heavy weights yet. Cracking Bitcoin’s cryptographic bouncers (SHA-256 and ECDSA) would require a quantum Hercules. We’re not there yet, as quantum computers exhibit significant limitations, particularly in qubit coherence time and error rates, that hinder their ability to execute the complex algorithms required to compromise cryptographic systems efficiently. Algorithms such as Shor’s, which could theoretically factor large prime numbers exponentially faster than classical computers, thus breaking the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) upon which Bitcoin relies, demand quantum processors far more advanced than those currently in existence.
Post Google Willow Chip
Bitcoin upgrading to quantum-resistant algorithms? Technically possible, but no quick shimmy. It’s more like choreographing a dance for a global audience — consensus-driven, complex, and painfully slow.
Studies suggest such a transition could mean downtime, rattling network reliability and market confidence. Add to that Bitcoin’s decentralized nature, where reaching agreement on anything is a marathon, not a sprint.
The takeaway: while Bitcoin can evolve, making it quantum-proof isn’t trivial. Early planning and proactive measures are the only way to keep the rhythm intact when quantum challenges take the stage.
- Bitcoin’s Got Moves: Bitcoin isn’t set in its ways. If quantum threats loomed large, Bitcoin could shimmy into some new cryptographic gear that even quantum computers would balk at, and it has been done before. It’s like updating your phone’s OS; a bit of a hassle, but doable. Bitcoin possesses the capacity for evolutionary advancement through consensus-driven protocol upgrades.
Post Google Willow Chip
Quantum computers cracking Bitcoin? A theoretical dance, not a practical performance — yet. Shor’s algorithm needs millions of qubits with near-zero error rates to take on encryption, and we’re far from that stage. Grover’s algorithm might promise a speed boost for hash functions, but building the quantum oracles it needs is like trying to assemble a jet mid-flight.
The frameworks are solid, but the execution? Still a moonshot. For now, Bitcoin’s cryptographic bouncers remain firmly in place.
- Quantum Choreography: To even think about hacking Bitcoin, quantum computers need to master some pretty fancy algorithms, like Shor’s for a tango with encryption or Grover’s for a hash-function hustle. Crafting these quantum routines to scale is like teaching an elephant to pirouette. Theoretical? Yes. Practical? Not yet.
Post Google Willow Chip
Quantum computers are the divas of tech — temperamental and prone to errors, thanks to quantum decoherence. Even the slightest environmental nudge can send their qubits spiraling into chaos.
But the drama is being tamed. Google’s Willow chip, with its clever error-correction strategies, shows that adding more qubits can actually lower error rates — a promising leap toward practical quantum computing.
The road to perfection is steep, but breakthroughs like Willow prove we’re turning quantum’s quirks into power. Reliable, robust quantum systems are no longer a dream — they’re a work in progress.
- Quantum Stage Fright: Quantum computers are the divas of the computing world, incredibly sensitive and prone to errors (quantum decoherence and high error rates). Getting them to perform flawlessly is like expecting a cat to walk on a leash—a comedy of errors.
Post Google Willow Chip
Quantum computers are the divas of tech — temperamental and prone to errors, thanks to quantum decoherence. Even the slightest environmental nudge can send their qubits spiraling into chaos.
But the drama is being tamed. Google’s Willow chip, with its clever error-correction strategies, shows that adding more qubits can actually lower error rates — a promising leap toward practical quantum computing.
The road to perfection is steep, but breakthroughs like Willow prove we’re turning quantum’s quirks into power. Reliable, robust quantum systems are no longer a dream — they’re a work in progress.
Quantum computing sparks both excitement and concern, especially for Bitcoin. While quantum algorithms like Shor’s and Grover’s theoretically threaten Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations, practical barriers — like the need for millions of stable qubits and ultra-low error rates — keep these risks firmly in the “not yet” category.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, isn’t standing still. Its decentralized, consensus-driven design allows for protocol upgrades, ensuring adaptability in the face of quantum threats. Transitioning to quantum-resistant cryptography is complex but feasible, and the precedent for evolution is strong.
For now, Bitcoin remains secure. Theoretical quantum advantages haven’t crossed into reality, providing a critical window to prepare defenses and keep Bitcoin’s cryptographic armor intact.
Quantum computing is great but it can't hack bitcoin.... not yet anyway was originally published in The Capital on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.