Only four of top 20 crypto treasury firms trade above their holdings value

The crypto treasury model was supposed to be elegant in its simplicity: buy tokens, hold them on your balance sheet, let the stock price ride the wave. Turns out, the market has decided most of these companies are worth less than the tokens sitting in their wallets.

As of September 21, only four of the top 20 digital asset treasury firms by assets under management traded at a premium to the market value of their token holdings, according to an analysis by DWF Ventures. That means 16 of the 20 largest players in the space have a market-value-to-net-asset-value ratio, or mNAV, below 1.0. In plain terms, you could theoretically buy their stock, liquidate the crypto, and walk away with more than you paid.

The premium problem

The core issue is structural, and it strikes at the heart of how these companies grow. The playbook goes something like this: trade at a premium to your holdings, issue new shares at that premium price, use the proceeds to buy more tokens, repeat. When the stock trades above the value of the underlying crypto, the math works. Existing shareholders benefit because each new share issuance is accretive.

When the stock trades below that value, the entire machine grinds to a halt. Issuing shares at a discount to your net asset value dilutes existing holders. It’s the equivalent of selling dollar bills for 90 cents to fund your next purchase.

The outliers telling a different story

Firms focused on Hyperliquid and Zcash have been the standout performers, delivering 15% to 40% excess returns over their underlying tokens since July. Two names in particular caught the eye of analysts: PURR, which posted 31% excess returns, and CYPH, which clocked in at 38%.

A hundred billion dollars in search of a better model

The digital asset treasury sector collectively manages over $100 billion in holdings, according to data tracked by Blockworks and DefiLlama. The mNAV dispersion across the sector is wide. Some firms hover just below 1.0, a minor discount that could close with a good quarter. Others trade at steep markdowns that suggest investors see little reason to pay a premium for corporate wrappers around tokens they could buy themselves on any exchange.

The DWF Ventures analysis points to a set of factors that separate the winners from the laggards: financing terms, operating income, and managerial decisions.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.